Malaysiakini :: Letters
Malaysiakini :: Letters |
| Emulate India's code of conduct for GE13 Posted: 22 Aug 2011 12:23 AM PDT The Election Commission (EC) in some countries are mere brainless stooges. They confirm it the moment they open their mouths and issue statements sounding like politicians rather than statesmen selected to uphold honour and justice. They are worse than parasites and simply the political hatchet men specially selected by the powers that be, for their long sustained benevolent and unflinching servitude to their political masters. Some may call them 'mere running dogs' but I will not be that vulgar. But in some countries the ECs do justice to their selection and appointment and to the merits and tenets of democracy. One such is the Indian Election Commission. I had witnessed them in action not only in the last election in 2011 but also in 2004 and the manner in which they carried out their task was just superb. Whether you know it or not there is a model code of conduct and its values are universal provided your intentions are noble, ethical and serving the free and fair election module. And the code forbids rule by acts of betrayal, treason and worst fraud. How does this code operate? As an illustration, in 2004 Deputy Indian Prime Minister L K Advani flew in an Indian Air Force helicopter from Bangalore to Tumkur in Karnataka to address an election meeting? By the time Advani had completed his speech, the EC had announced the dates for the general election and enforced the Model Code of Conduct for parties and candidates. Advani was thus compelled to send the helicopter back and return to Bangalore by car. Such is the power of the Model Code of Conduct. The Election Commission through its Code of Conduct monitors the behaviour and actions of the political parties and their candidates in any elections. 1. What is the Model Code of Conduct? It is a set of guidelines laid down by the Election Commission to govern the conduct of political parties and candidates in the run-up to an election. 2. What is the need for such a code of conduct? It is intended to provide a level playing field for all political parties, to keep the campaign fair and healthy, avoid clashes and conflicts between parties, and ensure peace and order. Its main aim is to ensure that the ruling party, either at the federal level or at state level, does not misuse its official position to gain an unfair and vulgar advantage in an election. That there will be no institutionalised fraud and worst treason. 3. When does it come into force? The Model Code of Conduct comes into force the moment an election is announced and remains in force till the results are declared. In 2000, in India there was a tug of war between the central government and the Election Commission on the Model Code of Conduct. The government went to the Supreme Court against the Commission's ruling that the code of conduct comes into force the moment elections are announced. The government insisted it should be enforced only from the date of formal notification of each phase of election. The Election Commission called an all-party meeting to settle the row. Eventually all parties, including the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, agreed unanimously to support its stand on the Model Code of Conduct. That was democracy, people-power, and statesmanship in action. 4. To whom does the code apply? It applies to all political parties, their candidates and polling agents, the government in power, and all government employees. 5. So what does the Model Code of Conduct mean for a ruling party? In 2004 in India's ministers, including Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, were not allowed to combine their official visits with electioneering work. They also cannot use official/government machinery or personnel for electioneering work. Public places for holding election rallies and helipads for flights in connection with elections are to be made available to all parties on the same terms and conditions on which they are used by the party in power. Government institutions and enforcement agencies were expected to play a neutral role and not as active participants for the incumbents as in some countries. 6. Can ministries sanction grants out of the government's discretionary funds during election time? No. Ministers and other authorities cannot sanction grants and payments out of discretionary funds from the moment the elections are announced. 7. Can the government run an advertising campaign in the mass media? Advertisements at the cost of the public exchequer or in some countries using the Ministry of Finance and misuse of official mass media for partisan coverage during an election have to be scrupulously avoided. 8. What are the other guidelines for ministers and other government officials? Ministers and other government authorities should not announce or promise any financial grants to the people; they should not lay foundation stones for or inaugurate any projects; they should not promise public facilities like roads; and they should not make any ad hoc government appointments. 9. How do candidates and parties campaign when the code of conduct is in force? Parties can issue their manifesto detailing the programmes they wish to implement if elected to government, the strengths of their leaders, and the failures of parties and leaders opposing them. They can use slogans to popularise and identify parties and issues, and they can distribute pamphlets and posters to the electorate. They can hold rallies and meetings where candidates can persuade, cajole and enthuse supporters, and criticise opponents. Candidates can travel the length and breadth of the constituency to try to influence as many potential supporters as possible. 10. Can parties/candidates hold meetings wherever they want? Yes, but the party or candidate has to inform the local police authorities of the venue and time of any proposed meeting well in advance to enable them to make necessary arrangements for controlling traffic and maintaining order. 11. Can parties call for votes on communal lines? No. The Model Code of Conduct strictly prohibits parties and candidates from making any appeals to caste or communal feelings, on race, religion, or pitting communities one against another aided by a racist vernacular media as in some countries for securing votes. Mosques, churches, temples, and other places of worship also cannot be used for election propaganda. No party or candidate can indulge in any activity that may aggravate existing differences or create mutual hatred or cause tension among different castes, communities, religious or linguistic groups. 12. Can parties criticise their opponents? Yes, but the criticism of other political parties should be confined to their policies and programmes, past record and work. Parties and candidates should refrain from criticism of all aspects of private life not connected with the public activities of the leaders or workers of other parties. Criticism of other parties or their workers based on unverified allegations or distortions should be avoided. Worst they should not use third parties to orchestrate all forms of allegations and gutter politicking. 13. What happens if a candidate or party does not obey the Model Code of Conduct? The Election Commission has warned that any breach will be dealt with sternly. The Commission has the power to disqualify a candidate if s/he refuses to follow the Model Code of Conduct. I salute the Indian Election Commission again for their commitment to democracy, fair play, accountability, good governance, transparency and zero tolerance for corruption and corrupt practices and not succumbing to direct and indirect attempts by the powers that be to manipulate and taint them. They are unlike others 'hunting with the hounds and running with the hares'- milking all the business advantages and perks from the incumbents domestically, then inexplicably they trade the shades in other forums putting on the face of reformers, which is the height of hypocrisy. |
| Present electoral system unfit for any election Posted: 21 Aug 2011 11:34 PM PDT I refer to Malaysiakini report, 'Bersih says PSC is pointless once parliament is dissolved'. The electoral reforms are urgently needed now and before the next general election. There is still ample time to form the parliamentary select committee (PSC}, for it complete its findings and present the report for the necessary and essential changes to be made if loopholes or weaknesses are found in the electoral system. What is important is that any committee or commission planned to be set-up to look into electoral reforms, must carry out its duties with dedication and sincerity and produce unbiased reports bearing in mind it is done for the well being of the country in its continued pursuit of a fair and free democratic process. Malaysia has attracted millions of foreign workers, who are yearning to establish permanent residency here and if the system is weak and corrupt then the opportunities are plentiful to eventually gain citizenship not because they deserve it, but for other devious reasons. I want to believe it is not true that such practices exist as alleged by some quarters, but it does create a grave concern that there may be some truth in it if the authorities cannot give proper explanations. Do not sell the country for a few votes to boost your chances for victory. The next general election is expected to be 'battleground' for votes knowing the opposition has made a strong presence in the last general election and there is a strong possibility that the opposition is going to come out even stronger, even if they cannot wrest the federal government seat from BN. If the electoral system is not strengthened to eradicate fraudulent voting through vote buying and alleged illegal voter registration, then whoever holds the reigns of power now has the advantage to manipulate the results. If the PM is sincere in his call to look into the seen weaknesses in the electoral system, then he should guarantee the PSC to completes its job and the results are made public before setting an election date. It will also help to exonerate the PM from the many accusations that he lacks proper direction and focus and is a weak leader unlike Dr Mahathir, the latter whom whether right or wrong, was in total control and made all the important decisions throughout his tenure. Vote buying must be stopped and those who continue to indulge in it must be severely punished to deter others. Registration of non qualifying individuals as voters is a serious crime and it is tantamount to treachery and betrayal of trust. It is the worst crime one can commit and anyone caught and convicted of this heinous crime must be given the death penalty. The results of the next general election will be cast in doubt if the electoral system is not looked into thoroughly. It is the people's choice whether they want a party to rule for fifty years or more but it must be carried out in a legitimate way. A strong electoral system will guarantee a more honest and fair process is carried out with proper and close supervision by officials we can trust. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Malaysiakini :: Letters To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Upacara itu disempurnakan di hadapan Yang Dipertua Dewan Negara 
Laporan itu juga berkata gerakan memurtadkan orang Islam semakin berani dan dilakukan secara terbuka. Sehubungan itu, ia merayu usaha membantu mereka dari segi ekonomi, terutama menerusi tabung zakat atau Baitul Mal perlu ditingkatkan.
"Kepercayaan saya (waktu itu) sering berperang dengan hati sendiri," katanya.
Presiden parti itu, Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon, berkata di Sabah sahaja, 
Ketika ditemui Malaysiakini di gerai tempat wanita itu berniaga di ibu negara semalam, Mismah -- anak kelahiran Bawaen, Indonesia -- itu bagaimanapun masih mesra dan ramah berbual.
JPN bagaimanapun sehari selepas itu membuat penjelasan bahawa dakwaan itu tidak benar dan kewarganegaraan wanita itu sebenarnya diluluskan pada 31 Januari lalu. 
