Rabu, 14 September 2011

Malaysiakini :: Berita

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysiakini :: Berita


P Pinang sokong tubuh peronda sukarela

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 10:11 PM PDT

Pulau Pinang telah mencatat penurunan kadar jenayah yang paling besar di Malaysia - sebanyak 27 peratus tahun lalu dan penurunan 25 peratus untuk tempoh enam bulan pertama tahun ini, kata Ketua Menteri, Lim Guan Eng.

"Antara faktor penurunan kadar indeks jenayah adalah kerjasama dan sumbangan gigih Pasukan Polis Diraja Malaysia (PDRM), khususnya Ketua Polis Negeri, Datuk Wira Ayub Yaakob, pemasangan kamera litar tertutup (CCTV) di lokasi yang kerap mengalami jenayah dan juga kepolisan masyarakat.

"Kepolisan masyarakat adalah satu syarat penting untuk menjaga keselamatan awam. Demi memastikan kadar jenayah boleh terus menurun, maka kerajaan negeri Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Pulau Pinang akan menyokong penubuhan Pasukan Peronda Sukarela (PPS) untuk membantu pihak polis menjalankan rondaan," kata Lim dalam satu kenyataan hari ini.

Katanya, sokongan PPS dengan pihak polis diharap dapat mengekalkan kententeraman awam dan menjadikan Pulau Pinang negeri paling selamat di Malaysia yang sedikit sebanyak akan membolehkan Pulau Pinang terus menjadi pilihan utama pelabur dan pelancong.

"Antara objektif penubuhan PPS ini adalah untuk membantu pihak berkuasa Keselamatan dalam menangani kegiatan atau aktiviti sosial yang negatif di sesuatu kawasan termasuk membersihkan kawasan daripada anasir dadah," katanya.

Selain itu, tegas Lim, penubuhan PPS juga sedikit sebanyak dapat membantu PDRM mencegah dan membanteras jenayah, dengan bertindak sebagai pembekal maklumat, di samping menjalin hubungan kerjasama kejiranan yang erat di kalangan anggota masyarakat tempatan.

"Sehingga 14 September 2011, terdapat 40 pasukan dengan 840 ahli. PPS ditubuhkan sebagai langkah untuk memastikan kebajikan dan keselamatan masyarakat dan rakyat negeri Pulau Pinang tidak dipinggirkan," katanya.

Ramlah Adam: British benar-benar jadi penasihat

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 09:58 PM PDT

Ahli akademik pro-Umno Datuk Ramlah Adam menegaskan, polis yang berkhidmat ketika tragedi Bukit Kepong bukan polis British, sebaliknya berkhidmat dengan negeri Melayu yang berdaulat.

ramlah adam 150911 perkasaKatanya, pada zaman itu, British benar-benar menjadi penasihat kepada raja-raja Melayu dan arahannya tidak lagi mesti diikuti, berbeza dengan keadaan ketika Perjanjian Pangkor dimeterai pada tahun 1874.

"British buat perjanjian bertulis dengan raja-raja Melayu bahawa mereka ketua negeri masing-masing. Dan bila dilantik menteri besar, yang lantik menteri besar sultan, yang lantik pegawai kerajaan sultan.

"British hanya British adviser (penasihat British). Buat kali pertamanya British adviser memang betul-betul adviser, berbeza dengan Perjanjian Pangkor 1874 yang ditulis bahawa nasihat itu mesti diikuti," katanya.

Bercakap dalam forum Mat Indera di Kuala Lumpur malam tadi, Ramlah berkata, selepas orang Melayu menolak Malayan Union dan Persekutuan Tanah Melayu dibentuk pada tahun 1948, raja-raja Melayu telah dipulangkan kuasa mentadbir negeri dan jajahan takluknya.

amin iskandar article 291008 merdeka"Hanya Kuala Lumpur bawah British (ketika itu)," tambahnya.

Sehubungan itu, katanya, dakwaan Timbalan Presiden PAS Mohamad Sabu bahawa polis pada masa itu bekerja untuk British dan Tunku Abdul Rahman sebagai pegawai British adalah "sangat salah".

"British hanya berkuasa dalam pentadbiran, bukan kedaulatan. Ini kejayaan Melayu terbesar, tolak penguasaan British melalui Malayan Union," katanya.

[Berita penuh menyusul]

Kredit: www.malaysiakini.com

Malaysiakini :: Letters

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysiakini :: Letters


Colonialism by any other name is still colonialism

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 01:30 AM PDT

Debates in post-colonial countries over who really led the independence struggle are nothing uncommon.

The Filipinos recently commemorated the centenary of the birth of their official national hero, Jose Rizal.

The occasion reignited an old debate as to whether the country's hero of independence should really be the radical plebian, Andres Bonifacio (who led the 1896 revolt against Spanish colonialism), rather than Rizal (who actually opposed the resurrection).

The latest phase of this old controversy in our country was unfortunately marred by a high degree of political partisanship.

But even for those of us who for this reason refrained from entering the fray, there was one statement by a protagonist in the debate which cannot go unchallenged.

This is the startling claim by a history professor that our country was never really colonised by the British.

"Startling" because it implies that all those who resisted British intervention were fighting a chimera.

"Startling" because it suggests that people like Maharaja Lela who led a revolt against the British were suffering from some hallucination.

The basis for this claim is that according to colonial juridical theory the Malay states were "protected" states as distinct from colonies.

Zainal Kling, the professor in question, claimed that Malaya had in fact "never been colonised" and was only a "protectorate" of the British.

"Being a protectorate is not the same as being colonised ... Only three states were colonised - Singapore, Malacca and Penang ... Stop saying (Malaya) was colonised for 400 years. That is a big mistake," he said.

Mistake indeed! The learned professor is obviously ignorant of the fact that as far back as 1935 Rupert Emerson, a Professor of Government at Harvard University, had in his study on "Malaysia" (which is aptly subtitled "A Study in Direct and Indirect Rule") shown up this so-called distinction to be nothing more than a piece of legal fiction. As the American don noted:

"Unfortunately, there is neither simplicity nor straightforwardness about the concept of the protectorate or the protected State... The obvious difficulty is that the device of the protectorate has been a very useful one for the Powers in their imperialist exploits and they have not hesitated to twist it in any direction which would suit their immediate purposes.

"In its origins the establishment of a protectorate has very frequently been no more than a preliminary to the establishment of full colonial rule, a device utilised because of its greater economy and its more tentative, but still sufficiently conclusive, character in relation to third States.

"In other instances, as in the Federated Malay States, a virtually complete colonial administration has been set up but the form of the protectorate has for one reason or another been retained. Given such situations, in which words are often used to conceal rather than to explain the reality, it is difficult to arrive at any final and satisfactory terminology or definitions which do more than skim the legal surface.

"But of one thing one may be sure: what is being protected is the interest of the protecting State and of the economic groups within it which profit from imperialism." (Emphases added.)

Further, Emerson goes on to point out that even Lord Lugard, the creator of the system of indirect rule in Nigeria, had admitted that "the distinction between the two is now without practical difference", while a Dutch authority had bluntly declared in 1916 that "the colonial protectorate must be regarded as a disguised colony."

It is indeed astonishing that an American academic could see through this piece of colonial sophistry in the 1930s while a professor in a Third World country which has been independent for more than 50 years is still perpetuating such myths.

It can only be explained by the persistence of colonial thinking in our universities and the enduring hold that colonial scholarship continues to have on the curricula.

It was in an attempt to highlight this problem that we in Citizens International organised an international conference in June this year on "Decolonising Our Universities". While the effort was indeed fruitful, it is clear that that there is still a lot of work to be done.

SM Mohamed Idris is the chairman of Citizens International.

Now not everyone can fly AirAsia

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 12:52 AM PDT

Once upon a time , AirAsia's slogan was 'Now everyone can fly.'

But nowadays this no longer holds true. In the beginning, AirAsia was really making a serious effort to enable everyone to fly on the no frills airline.

Fares were not only cheap for those who purchased their tickets in advance. Also there were no hidden costs and the total fares after taxes were cheap and really affordable to the man in the street.

In fact if you were lucky enough the tickets you bought could even be cheaper than the cost of the ticket for a long haul bus.

Not only were there cheap tickets but there were a lot of extras that normal airlines did not provide.

Senior citizens above 60 were given priority of boarding, you could select any seats of your choice, there was no such thing as fuel surcharge added to the cost of the ticket.

In short, there were no hidden costs.

But AirAsia , nowadays cannot boast of its 'now everyone can fly' slogan because its concept has been totally altered.

Now, its policy is to charge for everything. Senior citizens no longer have the privilege of boarding first. If you want to board first you have to pay for priority boarding. If you want to select your favourite seats you have to pay for it.

Just you think that is the end of it, you are hit with another cost. It's call processing fees for using a credit card for your online booking.

It seems that the credit card company commission is even passed to the passenger in the guise of processing fees.

The moral of the story is that we should no longer be deceived by the AirAsia slogan of 'Everyone can fly'.

Maybe its time travellers should revert back to our national carrier MAS. At least there are no hidden costs and what you pay is transparent.

And if you are a golfer the more reason why you should travel MAS because they don't charge you for your golf bags whereas AirAsia charges RM50 for that extra luggage. And if you are a handicapped person, please be aware that AirAsia charges RM15 for using their wheel chair.

Lastly, MAS provides you the luxury of boarding and landing using an air bridge whereas with AirAsia, you have to be content with climbing up and down a gangway to board and disembark your flights.

The reason? Because AirAsia can save paying the airport authorities for using the facility at the expense of discomfort to the paying customers.

Kredit: www.malaysiakini.com

Malaysiakini :: Berita

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysiakini :: Berita


10,000 pengundi kes 'MyKad palsu' dikeluarkan - PAS

Posted: 13 Sep 2011 10:53 PM PDT

Pemuda PAS mendakwa Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) dalam tempoh dua bulan telah mengeluarkan nama lebih 10,000 pengundi yang dikaitkan dengan kes kad pengenalan palsu.

NONEPengerusi pemulihan demokrasi dan mobilisasi dewan itu Suhaizan Kaiat berkata, perkara itu dikesan setelah pihaknya rancak mengenalpasti keraguan dalam daftar pemilih.

"Bukan mudah untuk sesuatu jabatan kerajaan menjejaki lebih 10,000 kes kad pengenalan palsu dalam waktu dua bulan.

"Persoalannya apakah JPN (Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara) sememangnya sudah memiliki senarai kad pengenalan palsu yang akan dimasukkan dalam daftar pemilih SPR untuk tujuan manipulasi pilihan raya?" soalnya.

Pada sidang media di pejabat PAS di Kuala Lumpur hari ini, Suhaizan turut mengedarkan senarai sepuluh nama bagi membuktikan dakwannya.

Ia melibatkan kes di Selangor, Perak dan Johor yang telah didedahkan sebelum ini.

[Berita penuh menyusul]

Umno S'gor saman PAS berhubung serbuan JAIS

Posted: 13 Sep 2011 10:52 PM PDT

Umno Selangor hari ini memfailkan saman terhadap setiausaha agung PAS, Datuk Mustafa Ali dan lima lagi responden berhubung dakwaannya Umno menjadi dalang serbuan Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor (JAIS) terhadap premis Gereja Methodist Damansara Utama (DUMC) bulan lalu.

umno saman pas, harakahSaman itu menuntut pampasan RM10 juta dari setiap responden berhubung kenyataan Mustafa itu yang disiarkan oleh akhar rasmi PAS - Harakah - serta menuntut pemohonan maaf untuk disiarkan dalam akhbar berkenaan.

Lima lagi responden ialah Presiden PAS, Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang; Mohamad Sabu (timbalan presiden), Angkatan Edaran Enterprise (pencetak), Ahmad Lutfi Othman (ketua pengarang Harakah) dan wartawan Khairul Azlam Mohamad.

Bagaimanapun, Hadi dan Mohamad dianggap sebagai satu responden kerana kedua-duanya mewakili pemimpin tinggi PAS dalam saman tersebut.

Selangor Umno liaison committee secretary Mohd Zin MohamedSetiausaha Perhubungan Umno Selangor, Datuk Seri Mohd Zin Mohamed memfailkan saman tersebut di pejabat pendaftar Mahkamah Tinggi Shah Alam kira-kira jam 11.50 pagi ini.


Menurut saman tersebut, Mustafa - yang juga pemegang permit Harakah - didakwa mengeluarkan "kata-kata fitnah" yang diterbitkan dalam Harakah edisi bertarikh 19 Ogos hingga 21 Ogos 2011.

Artikel itu bertajuk 'Pas akan dedah bukti, Umno main peranan operasi JAIS'.

"Tuduhan-tuduhan tersebut tersebut sangat serius di mana menyebabkan kehinaan dan keaiban kepada plaintif oleh khalayak ramai dan masyarakat awam, baik di Malaysia dan antarabangsa," saman itu dipetik.

Umno Selangor juga turut memohon injunksi mahkamah untuk menghalang Mustafa - defenden pertama - atau pembantunya atau ejennya daripada menerbit atau menyebabkan penerbitan "kata-kata fitnah" itu di media cetak atau elektronik.

Dalam sidang media selepas itu, Mohd Zin berkata saman terpaksa diambil oleh Umno negeri itu untuk mempertahankan diri walaupun pihaknya beberapa kali menyatakan kesediaan untuk menyelesaikan di luar mahkamah dengan permohonan maaf.

Tetapi, katanya, tawaran itu ditolak oleh PAS.

Sehubungan itu, katanya, mahkamah menetapkan 28 September ini sebagai tarikh pengurusan kes saman tersebut.

Kredit: www.malaysiakini.com

Selasa, 13 September 2011

Malaysiakini :: Surat

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysiakini :: Surat


Jerebu pada tahap membimbangkan

Posted: 13 Sep 2011 04:16 AM PDT

Jerebu yang kini dialami oleh kawasan pantai barat Semenanjung Malaysia amat membimbangkan. Pada hari ini, negeri Selangor merakamkan bacaan indeks pencemar udara (IPU) yang amat tinggi, khususnya di kawasan berhampiran Kuala Selangor (97) dan Nilai, Negeri Sembilan (98).

Merujuk kepada peta satelit, jelas dilihat bahawa punca jerebu kali ini adalah pembakaran yang berlaku di Sumatera, Indonesia.

Mengikut laporan yang disediakan oleh Jabatan Meteorologi Malaysia, bilangan "hotspot" yang terdapat di Sumatera mencapai 202 pada 11 September, manakala tiada yang dikesan di Semenanjung Malaysia.

Pada hari ini, bilangan hotspot telah menurun sedikit, dengan 34 dikesan.

Jelas bahawa punca jerebu kali ini berada di luar kawalan Kerajaan Negeri Selangor. Walau bagaimanapun, Kerajaan Negeri Selangor bersama-sama agensi kerajaan telah meningkatkan usaha pemantauan untuk memastikan pembakaran tempatan tidak memburukkan lagi keadaan.

Saya ingin menggesa Menteri Luar Negara untuk memberi keutamaan kepada kesihatan rakyat Malaysia dengan menyuarakan bantahan terhadap pembakaran yang berlaku di Sumatera kepada kerajaan Indonesia. Keadaan berjerebu ini telah pulang berulang kali tahun ini.

Saya juga ingin menyeru kerajaan pusat untuk menyiasat semua syarikat-syarikat Malaysia yang memiliki ladang di Sumatera untuk memastikan mereka lebih bertanggungjawab dalam kaedah pertanian mereka.

Segala aktiviti pembakaran yang dijalankan bukan sahaja menjejaskan nama negara tetapi malang lagi, jelas memberi kesan teruk terhadap rakyat Malaysia.

Penulis adalah ahli exco kerajaan negeri Selangor dan ADUN Bukit Lanjan.

3 hari berlalu, mana senarai masuk Umno?

Posted: 13 Sep 2011 01:14 AM PDT

Sudah berlalu tiga hari cabaran Dewan Pemuda PAS kawasan Padang Terap. Nampaknya, tiada respons daripada kepemimpinan Umnobahagian Padang Terap.

Gagallah mereka mengemukakan senarai ahli PAS tersebut. Bukan main gegak gempitanya pengumuman 'pembohongan' tersebut.

Saya percaya akan timbul lagi pengumuman-pengumuman serupa. Malah akan ada beratus-ratus malah beribu ahli PAS akan menyertai parti korup Umnomenjelang pilihan raya umum (PRU) ke-13. |

Sehingga, lojiknya PAS Padang Terap hanya akan berbaki yang dipertua, setiausaha, ketua Pemuda, ketua Muslimat dan ketua ulama sahaja. Teknik yang sudah tidak releven di zaman generasi X dan Y. Zaman Jepun bolehlah.

Ada beberapa teori kegagalan:

(1) Memang berita yang keluar itu satu berita bohong, penceritanya adalah pembohong dan orang yang percaya adalah orang yang kena bohong. Medianya pun pembohong juga. Parti yang mendakwa mendapat ahli PAS itu pun bohong.

(2) Gagal untuk membuktikan isu sebenar, maka spin jadi isu komunis. Sebenarnya hanya untuk menyelamatkan karier politik seseorang. Untuk membuktikan 'kejayaan' mempengaruhi rakyat. Bila bawa isu komunis dalam masyarakat yang bergelumang dengan perjuangan
kemerdekaan, maka gagallah jawabnya.

Berapa orang keluar sebab komunis. Bahkan pekung
Umno semakin terbuka apabila profesr yang mesra Umno sendiri mengakui bahawa negara ini tak pernah terjajah. Itu, kita serah kepada ahli sejarah dan akademik.

(3) Umno akan gunakan nama yang sama untuk mengumumkan ahli PAS yang keluar Umno. Selepas ini akan ada tempat lain yang akan umumkan. Modus operandi ini sudah lama PAS tidak gunakan di Padang Terap.

Kalau Umno nak mulakan, ayuh! Selepas Pakatan Rakyat perintah
Kedah, kita berkhidmat tanpa kira parti. Nampaknya Umno sudah mula timbulkan kegelisahan di celah keharmonian masyarakat di Tandop Besar.

(4) Kerisauan kebangkitan ahli Umno lain yang dipinggirkan bantuan. Walaupun sudah lama berjuang. Saya mengucapkan tahniah kepada keluarga 'PAS' yang mendapat durian runtuh dalam bentuk bumbung baru.

Saya percaya banyak ahli Umno sendiri tak dapat. Boleh sahaja kita senaraikan nama ahli Umno yang sedang menunggu bantuan di kampung Tandop Besar. Yang betul-betul susah. Bahkan seluruh Padang Terap yang merempat. Ingatlah betapa beruntungnya anda semua menjadi ahli PAS.

(5) Umno terkejut. Rakyat Padang Terap terkejut. Rrakyat Malaysia, bahkan ahli Umno sendiri terkejut dengan pendedahan yang dikeluarkan berkenaan salah guna secara tidak beretika
pemimpin Umno Padang Terap duit sebuah syarikat pembinaan.

Yang diambil untuk tujuan aktiviti parti Umno. Duit tu hak milik rakyat negeri Kedah yang dikurniakan Allah. Buat apa ambil.

Salah seorang rakyat yang membaca maklumat yang tersebar ini mengatakan: "Aku tida reda walau setitik air atau sebutir nasi yang dimakan oleh perwakilan Umno dengan menggunakan duit rakyat, iaitu aku".

Sebelum ini mereka anggap Umno adalah parti yang kaya. Maka silap, yang kaya ialah pemimpin Umno.

(6) Kerisauan bahawa ada lagi pendedahan yang akan dibuat. Silakan umum lagi dan ada lagi penyelewengan yang saya akan bongkarkan. Silakan.

Saya tahu masyarakat celik IT sedang memerhatikan dengan dekat cabaran saya. Ada juga kalangan pemimpin Umno yang bertepuk dan bersorak dengan pendedahan saya. Adakah hanya dengan sekadar cabaran cek kosong? Nantikan adegan seterusnya.

Penulis merupakan anggota parlimen Padang Terap dan ketua Pemuda PAS kawasan sama.

Kredit: www.malaysiakini.com

Malaysiakini :: Letters

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysiakini :: Letters


What is Pakatan's stand on PPSMI?

Posted: 13 Sep 2011 03:28 AM PDT

While the present government is still dragging its feet in studying the possibility of having both PPSMI (Teaching and Learning Of Science and Mathematics in English) and MBMMBI running concurrently, Pengerusi Lajnah Pendidikan, Abu Bakar Chik was recently reported as saying that PAS totally rejected PPSMI and even questioned PAGE's struggles.

It seems to me that PKR and PAS have publicly objected to and totally rejected PPSMI while DAP appears to prefer having PPSMI option in national schools, with science and mathematics taught in Mandarin and Tamil in vernacular schools. Combined, PAS and PKR simply overwhelm DAP on this issue.

With many parents from both urban and rural areas, including Malays clamouring for PPSMI, we should both implemented concurrently in Sekolah Kebangsaan. Parents will then having a choice of either English or Bahasa Malaysia (with Mandarin and Tamil in the vernacular schools) as the medium of instruction for both these subjects. This would be fairest and most accommodating to all.

With GE13 expected soon, it is time pro-PPSMI parents (who are perceived minority but actually silent majority) consider carefully who and which party to vote for. We must make brave and educated decision by voting for a government that is prepared to implement education policies fairly, especially those specifically provided for in the education acts and does not run contrary to the constitution of our country.

The people's constitutional right to PPSMI must not be left to the whims of politicians!

Pakatan Rakyat, tell us NOW, not after the elections, of your plans for PPSMI if any.

Why I don't celebrate National Day

Posted: 13 Sep 2011 01:54 AM PDT

I don't care for National Day. I don't celebrate National Day.

I don't put up flags, I don't watch the parade. I don't listen any of those manufactured nonsense theme songs like 'Satu Malaysia'. The only thing I celebrate is that I don't have to turn up for work that day. In fact, every morning of that day I wear casual clothes to enjoy my nasi lemak at a kopitiam.

Honestly I don't have reason to celebrate. Why? For what or whom should I celebrate? For BN, MCA, or Perkasa?

Celebrate that one political party that has hijacked my country for 54 years, its institutions and everything it stands for? Celebrate that BN has become a 'big brother' in Malaysia, a government which in turn has become the 'communist' government? The lines are so blurred that I don't even know what is right or wrong in the end.

Malaysia, BN, Umno, MCA, MIC, Gerakan, PPP, PBB, Perkasa and everything in between seems to be nothing more than extensions of one monolithic entity that seeks to control every aspect of our lives, like religion, culture, education, business, and living lifestyle.

We could read practically everyday news about the discrimination of the Chinese or Malay, ISA against civilians or parties who are opposed to the BN, corruption cases, and only everything that is good about BN. Using fear to control Malaysians, they turn into slaves to help BN build a mega corporation.

Celebrate that? Seriously?

Everywhere I turn there are banners with all sort of feel good, sound good exhortations to '1Malaysia'. The prime minister his ministers show '1' with their first finger and smile down benevolently at us while pictures of citizens are conveniently photoshopped beside them as if to say we are all one people, one nation.

National day, BN day - what's the difference? Those posters and banners put up by the town councils and grassroots organisations seem identical to those election banners and posters put up by the BN during election. Who really knows the difference?

The only thing I know is between the political leaders and us there is Satu Malaysia, two different rules. The first rules are apply to the BN. The second rules apply to the civilians. They make millions while we try to eke out a living, we stay together while they move ahead.

'Satu Malaysia' is for suckers who still buy that crap. It's very telling that among that challenges spelled out by PM Najib Razak, is that corruption can be found in every single government project.

Can I count on the government to bail me out when I'm poor and jobless? Can I count on the government to treat me when I am sick and penniless? Can I count on the government to provide me with a social safety net? Can I count on the government when I get old and alone?

It used to be said at least you can count on your EPF when you've reached retirement. Now who the heck knows, the newspapers say EPF had lost money, and BN went ahead and changed the regulation to prevent EPF funds from becoming insolvent. They can actually not pay you the money which they took away without asking your permission. As a Malaysian, who can I really count on except myself?

I think at some point during the celebrations, everyone was supposed to stand up and sing Negaraku together. Do these people even know what they are singing or are they just going through the motions?

Do they even know the true meaning of Negaraku? I for one did not sing Negaraku for it would be a tacit support of a gross hypocrisy. When one thinks of democracy, Malaysia is just about as far away from that as you can get.

The truth is there is nothing in the world I want more than to celebrate National Day, to proudly stand and declare, "I'm Malaysian". But I can't. I can't celebrate National Day while Malaysia remains a nation in captivity and its people are stripped of their rights and civil liberties. I can't celebrate National Day until Malaysia is returned to its rightful owners - the people of Malaysia regardless what race you are.

Put another way, if some goon came into your house and stole all your stuff, you sure as hell don't celebrate that.

Kredit: www.malaysiakini.com

Isnin, 12 September 2011

Malaysiakini :: Berita

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysiakini :: Berita


Pakatan: Tarikh PRU-13 mesti ditetapkan bersama

Posted: 12 Sep 2011 10:31 PM PDT

Pakatan Rakyat mahu BN menentukan tarikh pilihan raya umum akan datang dengan berunding dengan gabungan pembangkang bagi membolehkan cadangan pembentukan jawatankuasa khas parlimen (PSC) berhubung pembaharuan pilihan mempunyai masa yang mencukupi dalam menjalankan tugas mereka.

Ini adalah antara lima pra-syarat-syarat yang dibentangkan oleh Pakatan dan mereka mahu Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Razak memberi jaminannya sebelum mereka membuat keputusan menyertai jawatankuasa itu.

NONE"Tarikh pilihan raya umum ke-13 perlu ditetapkan berdasarkan persetujuan antara BN dan Pakatan. Dalam erti kata lain, pembubaran Parlimen mesti dipersetujui oleh kedua-dua BN dan Pakatan Rakyat," kata naib presiden PAS, Salahuddin Ayub.

Beliau berkata demikian pada sidang media Pakatan di Kuala Lumpur pagi ini, bersama-sama dengan Naib Presiden PKR Nurul Izzah Anwar, Ketua Pemuda DAP Anthony Loke dan beberapa ahli parlimen Pakatan yang lain.

[Berita penuh menyusul]

'Konspirasi tumbangkan MB' - Khalid tuntut penjelasan

Posted: 12 Sep 2011 10:07 PM PDT

Majlis Agama Islam Selangor (MAIS) perlu tampil dan menjelaskan mesyuarat 5 Ogos yang diadakan dengan Pejabat Peguam Negara dan beberapa NGO Islam yang membincangkan serbuan di Gereja Methodist Damansara Utama (DUMC).

NONEMenurut ahli parlimen Shah Alam, Khalid Samad dalam satu kenyataan media, hari ini, MAIS perlu juga menyatakan sama ada mesyuarat itu berbentuk rasmi.

"Apa yang dipersoalkan ialah tujuan pertemuan itu dan 'statusnya', iaitu sama ada ia pertemuan rasmi atau sebaliknya...

"Sekiranya rasmi, maka di mana surat jemputannya, apa agendanya dan mana minit mesyuaratnya? Sekiranya semua itu tidak ada dan pertemuan diadakan secara jemputan bisik-bisikan, tanpa surat rasmi, maka sudah pasti ia pertemuan konspirasi gelap!" katanya.

Bagi Khalid yang juga timbalan pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor, beliau melihat pertemuan itu sebahagian daripada konspirasi oleh MAIS, Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor (JAIS), Pejabat Peguam Negara dan beberapa NGO Islam untuk menjatuhkan Menteri Besar Selangor Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim.

NONEPengerusi MAIS Datuk Mohamad Abzib Mohd Isa, dalam satu kenyataan yang dikeluarkan minggu lalu, menafikan dakwaan berkenaan dan berkata mesyuarat untuk hanya bagi memberi taklimat kepada NGO berkenaan berhubung pemeriksaan JAIS ke atas DUMC.

Abzib juga berkata MAIS akan mengkaji sama ada tindakan undang-undang boleh diambil ke atas Khalid kerana memfitnah.

Khalid, sebelum ini menuntut penjelasan mengapa NGO berkenaan perlu diberikan taklimat sebelum laporan rasmi berhubung kejadian 3 Ogos itu diserahkan kepada menteri besar.

"Saya tidak tanya siapa yang mempengerusikan pertemuan berkenaan. Saya tanya adakah pertemuan tersebut pertemuan rasmi atau sebaliknya.

"Saya ingin tahu siapa yang menjemput dan menganjurkan pertemuan, bukan siapa yang jadi pengerusi. Pengerusi kadang-kadang main tangkap muat sahaja, lebih-lebih lagi pertemuan tidak rasmi.

azlan"Ada yang dijemput hadir, bila hadir, dia diketengahkan sebagai pengerusi sebagai tanda 'hormat' kononnya. Akhirnya pengerusi tersebut hanya sekadar memberi laluan untuk Pengerusi MAIS dan wakil pejabat Peguam Negara bercakap!

"Itu merupakan satu kemungkinan, bukan saya menyatakan ia berjalan begitu," katanya lagi.

Mesyuarat berkenaan dipengerusikan oleh exco kerajaan negeri Selangor yang bertanggungjawab terhadap hal ehwal Islam Datuk Hasan Ali.

[Baca berita penuh]

Kredit: www.malaysiakini.com

Malaysiakini :: Letters

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysiakini :: Letters


Time KLIA recognise disabled travellers’ needs

Posted: 12 Sep 2011 02:38 AM PDT

I was amazed to read that KLIA 2 will be the first airport in Asia to provide sky bridge facilities and most importantly once completed, will be a major shopping hub for people around the world. The RM2.8 billion airport has been described as aiming impress the world with its design and features.

However, I was surprised that MAHB has taken the liberty to exempt the low cost terminal from constructing an aerobridge in KLIA 2. This clearly reflects on how easy it is to compromise human values as opposed to profits.

It is important to note that from the day MAHB announced the construction of KLIA 2 without aerobridge facilities, disabled advocates have been making numerous statements, request, discussion and protest to ensure MAHB takes the necessary steps to ensure KLIA 2 is equipped with an aerobridge. An aerobridge is an essential feature in a newly built airport especially in a developing nation like Malaysia.

An aerobridge is not only pivotal given the state of Malaysia's weather but many fail to acknowledged its importance for people with disabilities, senior citizens, pregnant ladies, babies in prams and so on.

It is total unacceptable for the MAHB to allow such an exemption. This is clearly a violation of basic human rights. The idea of building such a costly airport and at the same time compromising on the safety of its passenger is unwise.

Many were of the view that ambulift will be the solution for this heated up battle between disabled groups and MAHB; however I am personally against the idea of using ambulifts in KLIA 2 due to the possible dangers it poses. In any case, the disabled are paying for the flight and airport services just like any other passenger, so it is only right for MAHB to cater for the disabled passengers' needs and allow them to board the plane with dignity without being carried in and out of a plane.

I sincerely hope the plight of the disabled are taken seriously by MAHB and the relevant authorities. KLIA 2 without an aerobridge is a step backward by MAHB and is highly unacceptable.

Indians flocking back to BN their own loss

Posted: 12 Sep 2011 12:43 AM PDT

This topic is what that has made BN and MIC so glad that they are back from being at the brink after the unexpected turn of events in 2008. The Indians were never the kind of community in Malaysia that would go against their political masters ever since they had decided to make Malaysia their home and stayed back from returning to India.

They were here just to make a living and sad to say that is still very much the mindset till today, thanks to the stereotyping and indoctrination by Umno-BN through the education system. What we have today is an Indian society that was simply trying its luck the last time around just to see what would happen if they protested.

Now after seeing that all their wishes have been slow in seeing its realisation, the Indians long for going back to the same old barn (the BN-barn) where they have been the most comfortable no matter what kind of treatment they would get.

The real happennings behind the scenes, the understanding of the division of power between the federal and state governments, these seem to be issues which the Malays and Chinese population understand better than the Indians.

If not for the incarceration of the Hindraf 5, the Malaysian Indians would have never woken up from their long slumber and the MIC will be the proudest party in the BN stable for providing a 100 percent winning ability in delivering nine parliamentary and 19 state legislative seats.

How the federal government manipulates the federal finances and continues to undermine and disrespect the choice of the people in Kedah, Penang, Perak and Selangor is of no concern to the normal Indian on the street.

They don't understand this and neither do they want to understand it, even though some of them may be graduates from local universities. It is never suprising to note that many amongst them are not even bothered to know their constitutional right to vote and their obligation to exercise that right in a democracy.

But the situation is just the opposite amongst the Chinese undergraduates, they are very knowledgable with regard to their right to vote and a vast majority of them are registered voters. Many wait for the opportunity to register themselves as voters and will not sulk if they are asked to go to a shopping mall to get themselves registered as voters.

The Indian undergraduates will find it difficult to even take the effort to learn about voter registration programmes and many have the view that their vote even if registered is not necessary.

Some even have the view that something bad and drastic will happen to them if they vote for any other party except Umno, MIC, MCA, Gerakan and PPP. Therefore with this mindset amongst the young the BN has been a proven winning formula.

Keeping the young Indians misled and misinformed and relying on the old indoctrinated Indians who will vote for a BN candidates - even if he does not even show up in their constituency and speak about national policies and his vision for a brighter and equal standing of the Indians with other races - is the best known way the BN keeps the lid on the Indians.

Indians have made a mistake and Pakatan should not loose much sleep over it, in the wake of the 2008 upheavel a vast group of the highly educated lot amongst them and generally amongst the other races as well have taken it upon themselves to vote for change.

These people understand the shortcomings and are able to see the bigger picture and see that only a two party system can see a proper practice of parliamentary democracy and a system of checks and balances in a country that believes in racial supremacy.

Though this group may be small but the fact is it will have the last laugh at the end of the day. After the 2008 upheaval and a mini revolution, the Indians saw their young graduates being appointed as magistrates, senior assistant registrars, police personnel and customs personnel, a practice which was slowly and surely being eradicated as there was no strong opposition from the Indians.

Besides Lim Kit Siang, Karpal Singh, M Kulasegaran and a few MIC individuals voicing their opposition to the low number of recruits for the professional categories to the civil service, the vast majority of the MIC warriors were not too interested or bothered as they had their eyes on lucrative Ali-Baba contracts which they could make some loads of money from.

The new class of Indian professional category civil servants will now make the new group of voters for the BN and they like their forefathers before them will not vote for any other party besides the BN.

The indoctrination and the divide and rule system has seeped into the Indian mentality with lasting effects. A classic example would be the sudden about turn of a group that was in the forefront with the Hindraf movement but now is a registered political party calling itself the Malaysian Makkal Sakti party.

The overnight U-turn shows how well the indoctrination works and this is very evident in the mindset of the Indian police officers; many of whom are tasked by the police force to infiltrate Indian organisations and NGOs and any sort of movement or grouping that goes against the word of the indoctrinators.

For the Malaysian Indian, their mindset has been tuned to a point that it is difficult for them to see beyond the racial lens which they have been accustomed to all this while. They see it as being acceptable to live out of the handouts and crumbs thrown out by the masters and the indoctrinators

Anything that goes against what the masters and the indoctrinators have spelt out for them will only invite trouble and this will continuously be the mindset, and they continue to live for the day and will not know when the local council will come knocking on their doors to serve them an eviction notice.

For the moment, the Indian Malaysians seems to want to return to the BN but in doing so, they are bound to lose out on the bigger picture eventually. This will happen when the Indian vote becomes insignificant when the newly legalised Malaysians of Indonesian, Filipino, Bangladeshi, Nepali and Middle Eastern dissent become synchronise with the Malaysian population.

They stand a better chance because the majority will be Muslim with many having children here with bin or binti in their names and will be eventually able to find a place for themselves in the definition of bumiputera, while the Indians will eventually lose out in terms of numbers which will then transcend to political power and representation.

The Indian's belief in the mindset that an Indian political party is for Indian voters will be a thing of the past as they will never be able to see themselves on par with their counterparts in Singapore who are not governed by racial and religious politics.

Indians there gain by merit and the best are sought by the government to be included in the national agenda to lead the nation in various fields, looking only at their ability and not the colour of their skin, the race they belong to or the religion they profess.

The programming of the Indian mindset by the indoctrinators is the best way the ruling elite in the BN and Umno can ensure that they stay within the confines of the BN barn. Making them beg for participation has created a community that sees the ruling Malay class as the masters and themselves as the faithful servants.

The masters, seeing that the Indians are faithful servants but lack in the unity department amongst themselves, make full use of this weakness to further exert control on their already stereotyped mindset.

The Tamil Hindu will despise the Tamil Christian, Tamil Muslim, the Malayalee Hindu, Malayalee Christian or the Telugus. In the Tamil Hindu majority, the caste that they belong to though not very significant today but still reminded upon by the elders will further divide them.

This has been well studied by the Umno masters and they exploit them to the hilt. For the Umno masters, all they care about is the vote and the continous if not perpetual right that they think they have to rule this country without question.

The Indians fail to realise that their best bet for the future is through multi-racial parties and politics. A good example will be the leadership of Ambiga Sreenevasan of the recent Bersih 2.0 rally.

Though the Umno-Perkasa-BN hegemonist described and called her the "Hindu Woman who is anti-Islam" because of her participation in Lina Joy's apostasy case, the Malays and Chinese from the opposition, NGO movement, 'thinking' civil society and Malaysians abroad accepted her leadership and looked forward to her brave stewardship of the entire civil task of registering a point with a very stubborn and recalcitrant Umno-BN government.

The Indians in MIC though, while silently proud of her leadership as one of their own ethnicity, never said a word about her bravery and courage in leading the charge to show the Umno-BN government that the people are fed up.

On the other side, the opposition is slowly but surely going on the right track by putting aside the racial mindset that we have all been stereotyped with, and coming out with a more Malaysian approach of looking at the bigger picture to see how we can progress as Malaysians instead of having only ethnicity in our minds.

Therefore looking at most current political reports and opinions that the Indian vote is heading back to the BN barn, one would say, let it be for they will be the eventual losers. Already being seen as the new urban underclass, the common jobs which the Indians will usually be hired for without question is now being taken over by Indonesian, Bangladeshi and Nepali migrants who have now become overnight legalised new-Malaysians.

This phenomena can't be stopped even if Indians in Malaysia were to give MIC nine parliamentary and 19 state legislative seats because the MIC's voice in the cabinet is always heard in low decibels or never heard at all.

Can we blame them? We can't, as they may then loose what little they and their kin are getting as a result kow-towing to their Umno masters. So whether Pakatan gets the Indian votes or not, is an issue which Pakatan shouldn't loose much sleep over; they have set the agenda, the thinking Malays, Chinese and Indians are ready to accept the fact that the only way forward is to be Malaysian first and racial denomination or ethnicity second.

If the Indians want to go back to the BN barn, let them do so.

Kredit: www.malaysiakini.com
 

Malaysiakini Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved